Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Sotomayor's not a liberal Scalia. This is a good thing.

Jeffrey Rosen: "Justice Scalia may be a brilliant bomb-thrower, but has failed in his attempts to build coalitions and bipartisan majorities."

Umm, yes. I don't know where this notion started, but it's silly. All things considered, I'd much have another Bill Brennan on the Court--who combined staunch liberalism with warmth and persuasiveness. More than anyone else, Brennan was responsible for halting the Burger Court's rolling back of civil rights rulings. I don't really know if there's another Brennan out there--even Eisenhower didn't know that Brennan would be Brennan, because otherwise Ike would never have picked the guy--but that's what liberals should want. Not a prickly absolutist who pushes moderates away.

I suppose that this is another way for a lot of bloggers to say that they want a bona fide liberal on the court. Sotomayor isn't that, I'll agree. But Obama will have more picks, and it would be good to have one or two of them on there, if only to improve the level of debate within the Supreme Court.

The Man, The Myth, The Bio

East Bay, California, United States
Problem: I have lots of opinions on politics and culture that I need to vent. If I do not do this I will wind up muttering to myself, and that's only like one or two steps away from being a hobo. Solution: I write two blogs. A political blog that has some evident sympathies (pro-Obama, mostly liberal though I dissent on some issues, like guns and trade) and a culture blog that does, well, cultural essays in a more long-form manner. My particular thing is taking overrated things (movies, mostly, but other things too) down a peg and putting underrated things up a peg. I'm sort of the court of last resort, and I tend to focus on more obscure cultural phenomena.